|
|
Post by BabyfarkmcGeezak on Apr 17, 2019 12:09:21 GMT
Cheese sandwich and Tesco's owns salt and vinegar crips - one of the big bags of which about half remain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheep2 on Apr 17, 2019 12:24:02 GMT
Popular is the style of music, not necessarily the current status of popular beat combo. It is sold out, but it is a reasonably small venue. |
|
|
|
Post by gongfarmer on Apr 17, 2019 12:24:54 GMT
2 cheese annunion slices, out of date yoghurt fruit corner, kit-kat (small)
|
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Apr 17, 2019 12:37:20 GMT
I've just discovered that Twix sell both packs of individually wrapped twix fingers, and packs of half length two finger twixes. These are ostensibly the same thing but arranged differently and its driving me up the wall. How have we come to this? Why? I realise the two half length fingers probably have more chocolate as they will have more surface area but this is MADNESS No, this. Is. CHATTERBOX! (kicks danky into pit) |
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 12:40:29 GMT
Cheese sandwich and Tesco's owns salt and vinegar crips - one of the big bags of which about half remain. A weird one today, started with Weetabix and Alpen, thinking of moving on to Beef and Tomato pot noodle and a bag of mccoys. should I risk it? |
|
|
|
Post by BabyfarkmcGeezak on Apr 17, 2019 12:41:52 GMT
Cheese sandwich and Tesco's owns salt and vinegar crips - one of the big bags of which about half remain. A weird one today, started with Weetabix and Alpen, thinking of moving on to Beef and Tomato pot noodle and a bag of mccoys. should I risk it? Absolutely. |
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Apr 17, 2019 12:45:14 GMT
Climate protestors distrupting public transport doesn't seem the best idea.
If people can't get the tube or train, they'll get a bus or taxi. More emissions (parp).
Plus it's not just bankers using those systems. It's other people trying to get to work, to school, to an appointment at the hospital.
They haven't thought this through.
|
|
|
|
Post by Conchord on Apr 17, 2019 12:51:36 GMT
Amipal's been playing too much AC:Greece.
Lunch, shawarma. And a protein bar for a (fake) sugar fix.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrTiddles on Apr 17, 2019 12:54:02 GMT
Liking your own post is digital masturbation I have liked this because Felice is right. |
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Apr 17, 2019 13:12:50 GMT
Climate protestors distrupting public transport doesn't seem the best idea. If people can't get the tube or train, they'll get a bus or taxi. More emissions (parp). Plus it's not just bankers using those systems. It's other people trying to get to work, to school, to an appointment at the hospital. They haven't thought this through. You're making several assumptions there, including rather literally equating the forms of transport being disrupted with the aim of the protesters to reduce traffic, and that public transport is good for the environment. Simultaneously, you are over-looking the likelihood that disrupting roads probably causes more road traffic pollution by causing greater traffic queues. What the protesters want is systemic changes to government policies and carbon targets. The method of doing that is less like a standard protest march, and more akin to terrorism (albeit non-violent and rather polite, so not a terror act in that sense). The deliberate disruption is part of the tactic, whether that's to road traffic or to rail transport, or to other functions of society and the state. If you insist on being literal-minded, I would point out that public transport is still a significant source of pollution that could be reduced very significantly with better government policies. The position of the protesters is that governments have failed to act, have been swayed by the interests of big businesses, show no sign of taking meaningful action, and are rather close to leaving everything a little too late with potentially dire consequences. The conclusion that radical protest action is required in order to bring about radical change would surely and necessarily go hand in hand with a pragmatic response to a criticism questioning whether causing a small harm today is justified by a potential significant improvement in the future. |
|
|
|
Post by Felice Landry on Apr 17, 2019 13:16:14 GMT
Well reasoned but strangely dull 4*
|
|
|
|
Post by Sheep2 on Apr 17, 2019 13:16:16 GMT
Tl:Dr?
Neil Shenguin
Too young to get a Young Ones joke?
FOAD
|
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Apr 17, 2019 13:19:05 GMT
Well reasoned but strangely dull 4* Your face is well reasoned but strangely dull. Have you considered changing your skincare and moisturising products? |
|
|
|
Post by senorspielbergo on Apr 17, 2019 13:31:41 GMT
Well reasoned but strangely dull 4* Your face is well reasoned but strangely dull. Have you considered changing your skincare and moisturising products? Aggressively reasonable, I'd call it. There's no call for that level of reasonableness. |
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Apr 17, 2019 13:42:15 GMT
I very much insist on being literal-minded.
And I have definitely thought-through every key issue. Definitely. All the issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 13:43:24 GMT
Absolutely and spot on. With the advent of technological advancement such as Tesla/electric vehicles and electric/hybrid transport there can be a significant reduction in pollution, but the government it seems doesn't want to fully back these innovative ideas. They most likely see it as a cost effective vs international trade deals (oil/fuel/petrol) and car industry profit margin/economic growth outlay. they earn more by having more vehicles built or imported and earn via a ripple effect within each trade area, so the payoff is higher short term than it would be going full electric long term. |
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 13:45:05 GMT
Well reasoned but strangely dull 4* Your face is well reasoned but strangely dull. Have you considered changing your skincare and moisturising products? Felice has a face?! |
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 13:46:50 GMT
Your face is well reasoned but strangely dull. Have you considered changing your skincare and moisturising products? Aggressively reasonable, I'd call it. There's no call for that level of reasonableness. I'm curious as to what reason you are able to make that assumption, I am aware I seem to be taking an aggressive stance! |
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 13:47:56 GMT
I very much insist on being literal-minded. And I have definitely thought-through every key issue. Definitely. All the issues. Except one- Your face is an issue! |
|
|
|
Post by Felice Landry on Apr 17, 2019 13:49:23 GMT
Kane, let other people speak
|
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias Kane on Apr 17, 2019 13:55:50 GMT
Kane, let other people speak I will as you've literally just asked me nicely! Peace |
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Apr 17, 2019 13:56:38 GMT
Kane, let other people speak Quiet, felice! Kane is talking! |
|
|
|
Post by RollingEscargot on Apr 17, 2019 14:01:11 GMT
Coincidentally, I bought Night Thoughts by suede about an hour ago. Since then I've been in waterstones considering buying the latest Stephen Donaldson but chickened out after browsing some online reviews. I did buy Pet Sematary for my daughter. Mostly I just wanted to hang around because last time I was in that branch I saw Tilda Swinton.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2019 14:11:23 GMT
Morning All! @bloggie, just seen your comment from Saturday. I'm assuming you meant Vikings isn't worth it? Just in to s2 and I'm still enjoying it. How long until it nosedives? Ganes! FFX, nope. Switch was dead in my work bag from the weekend so no pre-load for me. Hopefully it'll be done by the time I get home. Otherwise, bit more Graveyard Keeper and First Feudal, which is similar to Rimworld and pretty addictive so far. I think for me it was season 4 where it began to turn. I think they've said season 6 will be their last though, which I think is definitely the right call. |
|
|
|
Post by Tuffers on Apr 17, 2019 14:12:29 GMT
Tl:Dr? Neil Shenguin Too young to get a Young Ones joke? FOAD First Shenguin plants the seed... |
|
