|
|
Post by Sheep2 on Nov 19, 2019 14:19:43 GMT
Rambozo virtually lives in Scotland anyway. Lives on the coast north of Newcastle. Definitely further North than Gretna. Though to get to Gretna he would go west and a bit south (possibly, for all I know his sense of direction may be very poor)
|
|
|
|
Post by sandybahookie on Nov 19, 2019 15:03:24 GMT
Rambozo virtually lives in Scotland anyway. Lives on the coast north of Newcastle. Definitely further North than Gretna. Though to get to Gretna he would go west and a bit south (possibly, for all I know his sense of direction may be very poor) Gretna is in Scotland, they used to be haven for wedding Refugees from the Southern Wastelands. |
|
|
|
Post by Melvazord on Nov 19, 2019 15:03:35 GMT
Anywhere north of the M25 is basically Scotland. If that was true then they wouldn't be so shit at football. Hey...oh. |
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Nov 19, 2019 15:15:10 GMT
Melvazord is one of those refugees that they have from Scotland. Now, he's been in Inngerland far too long for them to ever take him back. :edit Is this helping? I am nicest.
|
|
|
|
Post by RollingEscargot on Nov 19, 2019 15:25:27 GMT
Sorry about your lizard, Melvazord Tuesday question. Why are there not more cemeteries (for people, not lizards)? Think of all the people that are dead. They should be all over the place shouldn't they? And yet there seem to be more Marks and Spencer Simply Foods than cemeteries. Perturbing. |
|
|
|
Post by RollingEscargot on Nov 19, 2019 15:28:49 GMT
Melvazord is one of those refugees that they have from Scotland. Now, he's been in Inngerland far too long for them to ever take him back. Like that time Judge Dredd spent too long in the Cursed Earth. He was a right fucking state when he came back, speaking with a weird accent and everything. |
|
|
|
Post by BabyfarkmcGeezak on Nov 19, 2019 15:30:09 GMT
Sorry about your lizard, Melvazord Tuesday question. Why are there not more cemeteries (for people, not lizards)? Think of all the people that are dead. They should be all over the place shouldn't they? And yet there seem to be more Marks and Spencer Simply Foods than cemeteries. Perturbing. How do you even get buried these days? Do you need a relationship with the church with the graveyard? I bet it's really hard now. |
|
|
|
Post by Faceless on Nov 19, 2019 15:34:04 GMT
Bargain Burials sounds like an excellent post-berxit business idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by scubar on Nov 19, 2019 15:35:29 GMT
As far as I know, you stay buried for a certain amount of time, then crazy french monks come along, dig you up and build cool shit out of your bones.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandybahookie on Nov 19, 2019 15:44:17 GMT
Worms eat your corpse and then poo you out as nice soil, thats what I heard
|
|
|
|
Post by Destry on Nov 19, 2019 15:46:16 GMT
Oh, by the way, I have the result of yesterday's caption competition.
There were no winners.
|
|
|
|
Post by Destry on Nov 19, 2019 15:48:35 GMT
Sorry about your lizard, Melvazord Tuesday question. Why are there not more cemeteries (for people, not lizards)? Think of all the people that are dead. They should be all over the place shouldn't they? And yet there seem to be more Marks and Spencer Simply Foods than cemeteries. Perturbing. How do you even get buried these days? Do you need a relationship with the church with the graveyard? I bet it's really hard now. I think I can help. We have a patio that needs relaying. |
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Nov 19, 2019 15:48:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Melvazord on Nov 19, 2019 15:49:26 GMT
Mrs Zord and I once discussed what we'd do in the event one of us was terminally ill. I said she should buy a new spade, smash my head in and bury me in the compost heap.
To which she replied "we've already got a spade"
|
|
|
|
Post by RollingEscargot on Nov 19, 2019 15:51:05 GMT
Marks and Spencer Simply Foods are being built on the graves of our ancestors. It's the only thing that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Nov 19, 2019 15:52:45 GMT
Sorry about your lizard, Melvazord Tuesday question. Why are there not more cemeteries (for people, not lizards)? Think of all the people that are dead. They should be all over the place shouldn't they? And yet there seem to be more Marks and Spencer Simply Foods than cemeteries. Perturbing. Are you suggesting that M&S food is playing a role in the disposal of corpses? This isn't just a pork sandwich, this is an M&S long-pork sandwich. |
|
|
|
Post by amipal on Nov 19, 2019 15:53:19 GMT
As far as I know, you stay buried for a certain amount of time, then crazy french monks come along, dig you up and build cool shit out of your bones. The final ignominy. |
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Nov 19, 2019 15:59:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Felice Landry on Nov 19, 2019 16:01:56 GMT
M&S special Soylent Green.
|
|
|
|
Post by Faceless on Nov 19, 2019 16:02:10 GMT
Weirdly enough I was having a conversation along these lines earlier. If people were incentivised to donate their bodies to medical science, i.e the boffins cover the cost of a memorial or whatever, then it reduces the demand on burial grounds, and saves having to fork out for a funeral. Everyone's a winner.
Either that or sun cannon.
|
|
|
|
Post by RollingEscargot on Nov 19, 2019 16:04:23 GMT
Backing up a bald assertion by quoting yourself on a previous occasion you've made the same assertion? Dangerously Johnsonian. God, I miss cuphead though. |
|
|
|
Post by Destry on Nov 19, 2019 16:10:45 GMT
Sorry about your lizard, Melvazord Tuesday question. Why are there not more cemeteries (for people, not lizards)? Think of all the people that are dead. They should be all over the place shouldn't they? And yet there seem to be more Marks and Spencer Simply Foods than cemeteries. Perturbing. Are you suggesting that M&S food is playing a role in the disposal of corpses? This isn't just a pork sandwich, this is an M&S long-pork sandwich. Soylent Green baguette with avocado and tomato. |
|
|
|
Post by Faceless on Nov 19, 2019 16:11:08 GMT
Pants chat, stationery pronunciation, and scubar's biography, all in one thread. Pure gold. |
|
|
|
Post by Destry on Nov 19, 2019 16:12:12 GMT
Damnit Felice.
Note to self, read ahead before posting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shenguin on Nov 19, 2019 16:17:33 GMT
Backing up a bald assertion by quoting yourself on a previous occasion you've made the same assertion? Dangerously Johnsonian. God, I miss cuphead though. There's little wrong with Samuel Johnson's insistence on an empirical basis for philosophy that can't be refuted thus: <kicks large stone> |
|
